Using Var, Let, and Const in JavaScript

As of ES6, we have two new ways to define variables, in addition to the classic var keyword. Each are a little bit different in their own way and I’ll break down those differences in this article.


The biggest difference between var and the aforementioned new keywords is around the concept of “scoping”.

var variables are function-scoped – this means that they are only available inside the functions in which they are created. If they’re not created within a function, they will be available on the global scope (aka the window object).

This can be unfavorable in a case where you want a temporary variable to just be set within a conditional or loop, for example. Conditional statements and loops are blocks and not functions, so anything defined within a conditional will be leaked to the parent scope (parent function or window).

In the code below, we are defining a variable inside of the conditional, which is really only needed for an operation inside of that statement.

for ( var i = 0; i < 10; i++ ) {
  /* ... do some stuff here ... */

Because we’ve used var here for the iterator variable, and the variable is set within a conditional block and not a function, the variable we’ve set specifically for the conditional operation has leaked out to the global (window) scope.

console.log( window.i ); // 10

This is really unnecessary, as the only reason this iterator variable was created at all was specifically for the use of this loop. Allowing it to leak out to the global scope in this way just pollutes that scope with unneeded data.

Let and Const

When using let and const, the issue with the for loop is solved because both let and const are block-scoped. An example of a block statement is anything within open and closing curly brackets {} – functions, conditionals, or even just a set of curly brackets themselves. If something is defined using let or const within a block, it will not be leaked outside of that block to the parent.

for ( let i = 0; i < 10; i++ ) {
  /* ... do some stuff here ... */
console.log( window.i ); // undefined

  let data = "some block-scoped information"
console.log( data ); // ReferenceError: data is not defined

Because of the way let and const are scoped, they replace the need for using IIFEs (Immediately Invoked Function Expressions) because nothing will leak into the parent (or global) scope by design – which is what IIFEs are typically used for.

Another main difference between var and these new keywords is that, unlike var, both let and const can only be defined once – you can redefine a variable defined with var but you will get an error if you try to redefine a variable defined with let or const.

// Var
var pet = "Tucker";
var pet = "Frank";
console.log( pet ); // Frank

// Let
let pet = "Tucker";
let pet = "Frank"; // SyntaxError: redeclaration of let pet
console.log( pet );

// Const
const pet = "Tucker";
const pet = "Frank"; // SyntaxError: redeclaration of const pet
console.log( pet );

The difference between `let` and `const`

A variable that has been defined with let can be updated but it can not be redefined. For example:

let pet = "Tucker";
console.log(pet); // Tucker

let pet = "Frank"; //SyntaxError: redeclaration of let pet
console.log(pet); // Tucker

pet = "Frank";
console.log(pet); // Frank

When using const, on the other hand, the data can not be redefined or reassigned. This does not mean, however, that the data is immutable. When working with an object that has been defined with const, for example, you can update the properties on that object – you just can’t wipe out or reassign the entire variable.

const pet = {
  name: "Tucker",
  type: "dog",
  age: 8
console.log(pet); // Object { name: "Tucker", type: "dog", age: 8 }

pet = "Frank";
console.log(pet); // TypeError: invalid assignment to const `pet'

pet = {
  name: "Frank",
  age: 3
console.log(pet); // TypeError: invalid assignment to const `pet' = "Frank";
pet.age = 3;
console.log(pet); // Object { name: "Frank", type: "dog", age: 3 }

If you do want to totally freeze an object, you can pass it to Object.freeze(). This will prevent you from updating any of the properties on that object. See MDN for more details.

Should `var` be used at all anymore?

There are a couple of popular approaches to using var, let, and const in defining your variables. These are just opinions, however, there really isn’t a definitive answer here.

Some prominent members of the JS community say, “let is the new var.” In this post, for example, Mathias Bynens states the following:

  • Use const by default
  • Use let only when rebinding is needed (only if you need to update the value of your variable)
  • var should not be used in ES6+

This is also the approach used throughout Wes Bos’s ES6 For Everyone course (which I highly recommend).

Other people, on the other hand, say that let, var, and const all serve different, nuanced purposes and are intended to be used together. Kyle Simpson, for example, states:

  • Use var for top-level variables that are shared across many (especially larger) scopes
  • Use let for localized variables with smaller scopes
  • Refactor let to const only after some code has been written and you’re reasonable sure that you’ve got a case where there shouldn’t be variable reassignment

This approach also addresses the downside of const – if you end up realizing later on that you need to update a value, you’d have to go back and update the const to use let.

While I most often find myself reaching for let and const over var, I do believe that the latter opinion makes the most sense – to use var for a variable that is actually intended to be used across multiple scopes. Some of the variables in your program may only be needed to be functionally scoped, where others may need to be block scoped. Additionally, in using both var and let in instances where they are best suited, you are also creating a good stylistic signal to the reader of your code for the intention of that variable – i.e., should a particular variable be used across multiple scopes or is it only intended for that particular block of code?

There really isn’t a definitive answer here. I think the approach you take boils down to what makes the most sense to you and in the code that you’re writing.

%d bloggers like this: